EPL Author Feedback Program
EPL has recently introduced an Author Feedback Program to enable our authors to let us know about their publishing experience. All corresponding authors receive a request to complete a short online form which asks a number of questions about the EPL service and communications they experienced while their manuscript was going through the peer review and publication process.
We strive to ensure the best possible publishing experience for EPL authors. The constructive comments we receive, whether positive or negative, will help us continually tailor the support and guidance we provide to our authors throughout the publication process from submission through to acceptance and final article publication.
“Overall, it was a very positive experience. The editorial team was professional, and the peer review feedback was insightful and significantly improved the manuscript. I appreciate the clear communication throughout.”
“I would, without any hesitation, highly recommend EPL to my colleagues. The reasons are clear: the journal maintains a strong reputation for quality in the field, the review process was rigorous yet remarkably swift, and the production quality is excellent. For researchers looking to disseminate impactful work in a timely manner without compromising on academic standards, EPL is an outstanding choice. It is a model of efficient and respected scientific publishing.”
Anonymous
“The editor found a very knowledgeable reviewer who made great suggestions. The production staff engaged in a genuine exchange of information during the page proof process and that information exchange resulted in an efficient and constructive verification of the proofs.”
Tim Johnson
Willamette University, United States
“PI appreciated a lot the feedback from the Referees, serious and professional. Their comments were constructive, and they helped me a lot (even if it took a while, two resubmissions).”
Lorenzo Cirigliano
Università degli Studi di Roma, Italy
“My overall experience publishing with EPL was overwhelmingly positive.
I was particularly impressed by the speed of the peer-review process, which was one of the fastest I have encountered without sacrificing the depth and constructiveness of the referee reports.
The referees’ comments were insightful and fair, genuinely helping to improve the final paper. The production team was also meticulous, and the proofing process was straightforward.”
Anonymous
“Publishing with EPL was a very positive experience. The review process was smooth and efficient, and the editorial team was supportive and responsive at every stage. The publication timeline was quick, and I was delighted with the visibility and reach that EPL provides to our research. I would happily recommend EPL to researchers.”
Priya Mishra
University of Lucknow, India
“I was very satisfied with my publication experience at EPL; the submission and review process was clear and smooth, and the editorial team was professional and responsive.”
Mohammed Belhaj
University of Béchar, Algeria
